On this page
The Short Answer
If you need to hire in LATAM quickly and don’t have — or don’t want — a local legal entity, an Employer of Record (EOR) is usually the fastest path: TN Outsourcing becomes the legal employer, handles payroll, taxes, and statutory benefits, while you manage the day-to-day work.
If your company already has an entity in the country and just needs help running payroll, statutory filings, and compliance, payroll-only support is the better fit — you stay the legal employer, TN handles the processing.
And if you’re planning to hire at scale over the long term, with headcount growth measured in years rather than months, setting up your own local entity usually makes more sense: at higher volumes, the fixed cost of incorporation amortizes better than an ongoing per-employee EOR fee. The right answer depends less on which model sounds best and more on your timeline, headcount trajectory, and appetite for owning compliance directly.
How These Three Models Actually Differ
Employer of Record (EOR)
TN Outsourcing is the legal employer of record. TN handles employment contracts, payroll processing, tax withholding, benefits enrollment, and termination compliance — everything that requires a local legal employer in that country. You keep control of day-to-day management, performance, and work assignment. Because no incorporation is required, this is the fastest structure to get someone working — typically days to a few weeks. It’s the right starting point when you’re testing a new market, hiring your first one to ten people in a country, or need to move without waiting months for a local entity to be set up.
Payroll-Only (Under Your Own Entity)
Your company is the legal employer, through your existing local entity. TN handles payroll runs, statutory withholding, filings, and benefits administration on top of that entity. Compliance liability sits with your company, though TN significantly reduces the operational burden of running it. This model is only available once your entity is actually employer-ready — not just incorporated (more on that distinction below) — so timelines depend on your entity’s status, typically a few weeks once it’s ready. It’s the right fit once you already have a subsidiary in the country and want to offload payroll operations without giving up direct legal employment.
Local Entity Setup
Your company becomes the legal employer once incorporation and the related registrations are complete. TN can guide entity setup and hand off to payroll-only support once the entity is established. Your company owns compliance directly, along with ongoing entity management. Incorporation in LATAM markets commonly takes a few months depending on the country, plus additional registration steps before the entity can legally employ. This is the right structure when you’re planning double-digit or larger headcount, a multi-year commitment to the market, or need a direct legal presence for other reasons — banking, contracting, or tax structuring.
| Structure | Legal Employer | Typical Timeline | Compliance Ownership | Typical Headcount Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employer of Record (EOR) | TN Outsourcing | Days to a few weeks | TN Outsourcing | 1–10 employees, testing a market |
| Payroll-Only | Your own entity | A few weeks (entity must already exist and be employer-ready) | Your company (TN supports processing) | 10+ employees, entity already in place |
| Local Entity Setup | Your own entity, once incorporated | 2–4+ months to incorporate, plus registration steps | Fully yours | 20+ employees, multi-year commitment |
What Determines the Right Fit
- Headcount trajectory — hiring one or two people to test a market versus planning to scale past fifteen or twenty
- Urgency — needing someone working next month versus building for a multi-year plan
- Whether an entity already exists — already incorporated and employer-ready versus starting from zero
- Compliance comfort — wanting to own local labor law compliance directly versus preferring to transfer that risk
- Cost at scale — EOR fees stack per employee, while incorporation carries fixed costs that amortize better past a certain headcount
The Cost Question: Fully Loaded, Not Just the Rate
Whatever structure you choose, the gross salary quoted for a role is only the starting point. In LATAM markets, statutory costs on top of base salary commonly include employer social security and pension contributions, severance provisioning — accrued whether or not an employee is ever terminated — vacation pay and, in many countries, a mandatory 13th-salary bonus, plus other statutory benefits that vary by country. These add a meaningful percentage on top of gross salary, and the exact figure depends on the country, role, and salary band — worth confirming for your specific hiring plan before budgeting.
| Cost Component | EOR | Payroll-Only | Local Entity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross salary | Included in TN’s quote | Paid directly by you | Paid directly by you |
| Statutory employer contributions (social security, pension) | Included in TN’s quote | Paid by you, processed by TN | Paid and managed by you |
| Severance provisioning | Managed and provisioned by TN | Your liability; TN can help track | Your liability |
| 13th salary / vacation bonus (where applicable by country) | Included in TN’s quote | Paid by you, processed by TN | Paid and managed by you |
| Provider / administrative fee | TN’s EOR fee (per employee) | TN’s payroll processing fee | None — but entity setup and maintenance costs apply |
Signs You Already Have an Entity but Aren’t Ready to Hire
Incorporating a company and being ready to legally employ someone are two different milestones. A few signs a “paper” entity isn’t employer-ready yet: no local payroll or tax ID registered specifically for employment purposes, no registration with the local social security or pension authority, no local bank account set up for payroll disbursement, and no confirmation from local legal or HR counsel that labor law compliance steps are actually in place. If any of these gaps exist, payroll-only support isn’t available yet — incorporation is step one, not the finish line. (A full entity-readiness checklist is coming as a companion piece.)
When to Move From One Model to Another
EOR is often best treated as a bridge, not a final destination. Companies typically move from EOR to their own entity when headcount in a country crosses the point where entity costs run lower than EOR fees, when they need a taxable local presence for cash management or contracting reasons, or when they want local structures — intellectual property protections or equity plans, for example — that aren’t available through an EOR arrangement. There’s no fixed headcount that triggers the switch; the tipping point depends on projected growth, budget, and how much administrative burden a company is ready to take on directly. The transition itself is a project of its own — novating contracts, migrating benefits, coordinating start dates — so starting that conversation early avoids a compliance gap during the switch.
FAQ
What’s the difference between EOR and payroll-only in LATAM?
With EOR, the provider is the legal employer of record. With payroll-only, your company remains the legal employer, and the provider only processes payroll, taxes, and statutory filings on your entity’s behalf. EOR doesn’t require your company to have a local entity; payroll-only does.
Do I need a local entity to hire in LATAM?
No. An EOR lets you hire without incorporating. A local entity becomes worth the investment once your headcount and time horizon in that country justify the fixed cost of incorporation and ongoing entity maintenance.
How do I know if my existing entity can legally employ people?
Incorporation alone doesn’t make an entity employer-ready. At minimum, it needs local tax and payroll registration for employment purposes, social security or pension registration, and a local bank account set up for payroll. If any of those are missing, the entity isn’t ready to employ yet, even if it’s fully incorporated.
What information does a provider need to quote EOR, payroll, or managed services accurately?
Country, role and target gross salary, expected start date, benefits expectations, and — for payroll-only specifically — confirmation that the entity is already registered for employment purposes. The more specific the role and country, the more accurate the quote.
Can I switch from EOR to a local entity later?
Yes. This is a common path as headcount grows. It involves novating the employment relationship, transferring benefits, and coordinating timing so there’s no compliance gap between structures. Planning the switch a few months ahead of the target date keeps it smooth.
How TN Outsourcing Supports Each Model
Whichever structure fits today, TN Outsourcing supports EOR, payroll-only, and local entity setup so companies aren’t locked into one model as they grow. That means the conversation doesn’t have to start with which product to buy; it starts with your hiring plan, and TN helps map the right structure to it, with the option to move between models as headcount and strategy evolve.
Not sure which one fits your situation? Talk to TN Outsourcing and get a structure recommendation based on your specific headcount plan, timeline, and countries.
Ready to start?
Talk to an Expansion Specialist
Find the right outsourcing model for your stage and goals in one call.
Request a Discovery CallRelated Articles


